Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 941 SW2D 63 - State v. Livesay

State v. Livesay’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
September 2009
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Zatsky v. United States · In Re Martin · McNutt v. Superior Court of State of Ariz. · Commonwealth v. Manning · 54 Cal. 2d 757 - In re Koehne

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We do not believe that simply suppressing the State's blood alcohol test is a sufficient safeguard of the Defendant's right to be able to gather and preserve evidence in his defense. This evidence, if favorable to the Defendant, could easily have secured his acquittal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.