¶1ORDER
¶2Michael K. Putnam appeals from a jury verdict in favor of defendant, David T. Duncan, M.D., in a medical malpractice action involving the death of his wife, Karen Putnam. We affirm.
¶3An extended opinion would serve no prece-dential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).