Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 941 SW2D 847 - State v. Larson

State v. Larson’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
February 2014
most recently cited

13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently February 2014

13 state decisions

100199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Cox · State v. Anderson · State v. Dreiling · Bailey v. Valtec Hydraulics, Inc. · State v. Hogan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A bill of particulars clarifies the charging document. It prevents surprise and restricts the [S]tate to what is set forth in the bill. The bill of particulars is not intended to make the [S]tate reveal for the defendant the details of the evidence on which it seeks to establish its case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.