William Inglis Sons Baking Company v. Continental Baking Company Inc William Inglis & Sons Baking Company’s Empirical Analysis
942 F.2d 1332 · 1991
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Relies on Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · Brown Shoe Co. v. United States · Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc. · United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. · Story Parchment Co. v. Paterson Parchment Paper Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he waiver implicit in remittitur [is] a narrow one that involves only the right to appeal the reduction of damages effected by the remittitur.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The Deduction of the Campbell-Taggart Payment,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“is designed to ensure a quantification of injury that is 'approximate' rather than highly precise and certain.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.