Cornell University v. UAW Local 2300, United Automobile Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America’s Empirical Analysis
942 F.2d 138 · 1991
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently February 2015
7 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co. · Lujan v. National Wildlife Federation · Mills v. Alabama · Rochdale Village, Inc. v. Public Service Employees Union, Local No. 80 · S.A. Mineracao Da Trindade-Samitri v. Utah International Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“any matter involving the interpretation or application of this Agreement which alleges a violation of the rights of an employee or the Union under the terms of this Agreement”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[W]e have held that where a later contract lacking an arbitration clause supplements an earlier ‘umbrella’ agreement containing such a clause, disputes under the later agreement are arbitrable. By the same token, if the contract and the [later contract] are ‘collateral’ to one another ... then the arbitration clause in the [CBA] does not apply to a dispute arising under the [later contract].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“to a collective bargaining agreement, but it must be dissimilar and”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.