Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 942 F.2d 1427 - Boise Cascade Corp. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency

Boise Cascade Corp. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency’s Empirical Analysis

942 F.2d 1427 · 1991

Citation profile

175
cited by 175 later decisions
October 2024
most recently cited

97 federal appellate · 8 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 175 later decisions — most recently October 2024 · most notably Northwest Forest Resource Council v. Glickman (1996), Carson Harbor Village, Ltd. v. Unocal Corp. (2000)

97 federal appellate · 8 district ·

7501991200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Mianus River Preservation Committee v. Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency · Shell Oil Co. v. Train · Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. Environmental Protection Agency · American Paper Institute, Inc. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 175 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “as a whole, giving effect to each word and making every effort not to interpret a provision in a manner that renders other provisions of the same statute inconsistent, meaningless or superfluous.”
    18 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “We must presume that words used more than once in the same statute have the same meaning.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “any effluent limitation or other limitation under section 1311, 1312, 1316, or 1345 of this title”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.