942 So. 2d 12 - Brown v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
May 2019
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 491 So. 2d 1129 - State v. DiGuilio · United States v. Gonzalez-Lopez · 801 So. 2d 877 - Overton v. State · Buschardt v. Jones · 504 So. 2d 1280 - McKay v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) time available for preparation, (2) likelihood of prejudice from the denial, (3) defendant’s role in shortening preparation time, (4) complexity of the case, (5) availability of discovery, (6) adequacy of counsel actually provided, and (7) skill and experience of chosen counsel and his pre-retention experience with either the defendant or the alleged crime.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Madison v. State“if P [reasonable judges disagree as to the propriety of the trial court's ruling], then Q [the trial court did not abuse its discretion],”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Madison v. State“McKay v. State , 504 So. 2d 1280 , 1282 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986). However,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Boffo v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.