942 So. 2d 145 - Champluvier v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
June 2016
most recently cited
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 895 So. 2d 836 - Bush v. State · 503 So. 2d 803 - Wetz v. State · 716 So. 2d 1083 - Gleeton v. State · Franklin v. State · 451 So. 2d 706 - Jesco, Inc. v. Whitehead
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The constituent elements of the offense are (1) an agent or trustee of a private person, (2) embezzling or converting to his own use, (3) rights in action, money, or other valuable security, effects or property of any kind, (4) which have been intrusted to his care or possession by virtue of his position or employment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Wilson v. State“Words used in the singular number only, either as descriptive of persons or things, shall extend to and embrace the plural number; and words used in the plural number shall extend to and embrace the singular number, except where a contrary intention is manifest.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent“This chapter is applicable to every statute unless its general object, or the context of language construed, or other provisions of law indicate that a different meaning or application was intended from that required by this chapter.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.