942 So. 2d 579 - State v. Dodson’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
June 2012
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Boykin v. Alabama · Ohio v. Robinette · 338 So. 2d 584 - State v. Crosby · 441 So. 2d 732 - State v. Lynch · State Ex Rel. Jackson v. Henderson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“With regard to the exceptions that Dodson complains of, they appear to be designed primarily to except these persons from the weapons prohibition in the statute, although by their terms they do except these persons from the drug weapons provision in section (E) as well. One rational basis for this would simply be to prevent an off-duty, reserve or retired officer from running afoul of the law inadvertently when assisting other officers or when there is a question about the on-duty or active status of the officer.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“examine the D.A.'s witnesses during the course of trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Dodson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.