Eslick v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
2
states following
March 2010
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. McCary · State v. Liddle
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The appellate court reversed, stating: Obviously, some records that relate to several charges, some resulting in convictions and others resulting in acquittals, may be of such a character that it is impractical to redact the part dealing with the dismissed charges. However, the mandatory nature of the expunetion statute means that any exception to it must be for cause shown. In this respect, a blanket refusal to expunge any records relating to a dismissed charge is inherently suspect and it is incumbent upon the opponent of expunetion to insure that the record justifies less than full redaction of relevant records.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Connors
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.