Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 943 F.2d 1007 - United States v. Monroe

United States v. Monroe’s Empirical Analysis

943 F.2d 1007 · 1991

Citation profile

237
cited by 237 later decisions
4
states following
December 2019
most recently cited

158 federal appellate · 2 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 237 later decisions — most recently December 2019 · most notably United States v. Necoechea (1993), United States v. Ponce (1995)

158 federal appellate · 2 district · 4 state decisions

2010199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1952 · 18 U.S.C. § 1956 (§ 1352 of the Money Laundering Control Act of 1986) · 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 18 U.S.C. § 2314 · 18 U.S.C. § 3231 · 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 21 U.S.C. § 843 (§ 403 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 952

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Giglio v. United States · Roviaro v. United States · Missouri v. Continential Insurance Cos. · Mahan & Rowsey, Inc. v. Oklahoma Natural Gas

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 237 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “does not constitute vouching if it is made in response to an attack on the witness's credibility because of his plea bargain.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “If a defendant is convicted of a conspiracy ... involving a controlled substance, the offense level shall be the same as if the object of the conspiracy ... had been completed.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Where ... a defendant exercises decisionmaking authority and an organizational role, an upward adjustment under § 3B1.1 is appropriate.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.