Barlow v. Ground’s Empirical Analysis
943 F.2d 1132 · 1991
Citation profile
51 federal appellate · 5 district · 10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 144 later decisions — most recently March 2019 · most notably Act Up!/Portland v. Bagley (1992), Blankenhorn v. City of Orange (2007)
51 federal appellate · 5 district · 10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Anderson v. Creighton · Graham v. Connor · Malley v. Briggs · Schmerber v. State of California · Mincey v. Arizona
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 144 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“must balance “the nature and quality of the intrusion on the individual’s Fourth Amendment interests against the countervailing government interests at stake.” Relevant factors to this inquiry include, but are not limited to, the severity of the crime at issue, whether the suspect poses an immediate threat to the safety of the officers or others, and whether he is actively resisting arrest or attempting to evade arrest by flight.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Even if the parties agreed on the amount of force that was applied in this case, the question whether that force was reasonable could not properly be resolved on summary judgment.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“in light of the facts and circumstances confronting them. 11 Graham, 490 U.S. at 396-97 , 109 S.Ct. at 1872 (internal quotations omitted). E.g., Barlow, 943 F.2d at 1135 .”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.