Ward v. Skinner’s Empirical Analysis
943 F.2d 157 · 1991
Citation profile
14 federal appellate · 4 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently October 2014 · most notably Tate v. Farmland Industries, Inc. (2001), J.L. v. Social Security Administration (1992)
14 federal appellate · 4 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 794 · 5 U.S.C. § 701 · 5 U.S.C. § 702 · 5 U.S.C. § 706
Relies on Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe · Abbott Laboratories v. Gardner · Heckler v. Chaney · School Board of Nassau County Florida v. H Arline · Webster v. Doe
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“prevent us from reviewing other claims of illegality--such as a claim that the Department's [action], say, rested on unconstitutional racial discrimination, or ... violated the Rehabilitation Act”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. J.L., and K.P., on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated Share Ourselves v. Social Security Administration, Gwendolyn S. King, Commissioner of Social Security, and Louis D. Sullivan, M.D., Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, in Their Official Capacities · J.L. v. Social Security Administration“a person is physically qualified to drive a motor vehicle if that person ... [h]as no established medical history or clinical diagnosis of epilepsy”). . Their differing estimates create no genuine dispute of material fact. Even under plaintiff's low estimate, the use of a forklift was required to perform the .essential functions of the warehouse job. . Ohio state courts have similarly held that”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“We doubt that . . . the Department [of Transportation] could not adopt reasonable rules concerning the relationship between certain handicaps . . . and certain activities like driving.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.