United States v. Hall’s Empirical Analysis
943 F.2d 39 · 1991
Citation profile
16 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 18 U.S.C. § 3742 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on Wrenn v. Thornburgh · United States v. Rutana · United States v. Smith · United States v. Gurgiolo · United States v. Rodriguez-Suarez
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'[t]he government may file a notice of appeal in the district court for review of an otherwise final sentence if ... the Attorney General or the Solicitor General personally approves the filing of the notice of appeal.' ” Hall, 943 F.2d at 41 (quoting 18 U.S.C. § 3742 (b) (1987)) (omission in original). The Long Court reviewed the amended version of § 3742(b), which provided, in relevant part, that”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.