United States v. Mark’s Empirical Analysis
943 F.2d 444 · 1991
Citation profile
110 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 199 later decisions — most recently August 2021 · most notably United States v. White (2005), United States v. Queen (1997)
110 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3742 · 21 U.S.C. § 812 (§ 202 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on Missouri v. Continential Insurance Cos. · McMillan v. Pennsylvania · Daniel v. Security Pacific National Bank · Unimet Corp. v. United Steelworkers · Dade County v. Lake Lucerne Civic Ass'n
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 199 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity, or absence of mistake or accident.”
15 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(1) relevant to an issue other than character; (2) necessary; and (3) reliable.”
14 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“'all evidence of other crimes [or acts] relevant to an issue in a trial, except that which tends to prove only criminal disposition.'”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.