Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

943 F.2d 49

Docket No. 91-8047.

In Re Steven A. Silvers

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted Aug. 20, 1991. Decided Sept. 6, 1991.

This page is marked noindex.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1991-09-06

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently February 2001 · most notably Panhorst v. United States (2001), Ross Stores, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board (2001)

32 federal appellate ·

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1991-09-06

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

Steven A. Silvers, petitioner pro se.

PETITION DENIED.

Before PHILLIPS, MURNAGHAN and SPROUSE, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Steven A. Silvers petitions for a writ of mandamus directing United States District Judge Herbert Maletz to rule on Silvers' motion for return of property confiscated at the time of his 1987 arrest for drugrelated offenses. The motion was filed on June 21, 1990. Since then, the United States has filed at least one status report with the court, but has not yet responded to the motion.

¶2

The delay in this case is not attributable to the district judge. Instead, the delay is due, at least in part, to the government's failure to file a response in the district court.

¶3

Because the district court has not unduly delayed, we deny the petition for a writ of mandamus without prejudice to Silvers' right to refile. As our review of the materials before us reveals that it would not significantly aid the decisional process, we dispense with oral argument. Leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted.

¶4

PETITION DENIED.

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

/943/f2d/49 · .json · Public domain