Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 943 F.2d 554 - Lee v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Lee v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

943 F.2d 554 · 1991

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
August 1998
most recently cited

17 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on The Boeing Company v. Daniel C. Shipman · Gaines v. Hamman · Fitz-Gerald v. Hull · Thigpen v. Locke · MacDonald v. Follett

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Crim Truck held: [t]he fact that one businessman trusts another, and relies upon his promise to perform a contract, does not give rise to a confidential relationship. According to Lee, the facts also show that Lee and Wal-Mart had repeatedly dealt informally with each other in a series of similar transactions over a period of ten years. Crim Truck held: Neither is the fact that the relationship has been a cordial one, of long duration, evidence of a confidential relationship____ Crim Truck reaffirmed that a party to a contract is free to pursue its own interests, even if it results in a breach of that contract, without incurring tort liability____ By analogy, then, a party to a business relationship should be free to pursue its own interests in negotiating leases, even if the negotiations result in a perceived bad deal for the other party, without incurring tort liability.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “parties' positions, harmonized for purposes of self-interest, were yet naturally antagonistic.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “relationship based on repeated transactions”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.