Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 943 F.2d 855 - Rodabaugh v. Sullivan

Rodabaugh v. Sullivan’s Empirical Analysis

943 F.2d 855 · 1991

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
January 2003
most recently cited

10 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on Mathews v. Eldridge · Weinberger v. Salfi · Texas State Teachers Ass'n v. Garland Independent School District · Hewitt v. Helms · Larry Nadeau v. Raymond A. Helgemoe, Warden, New Hampshire State Prison

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) a colorable constitutional claim collateral to the substantive claim; (2) irreparable injury by enforcement of the exhaustion requirement; and (3) that the purpose of exhaustion would not be served by requiring further administrative procedures.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “for asserting a claim based upon his former wife's loss of benefits. This appeal followed, in which Mary and Melvin note that Mary's benefits have been reinstated, but reassert that she should receive back payments for the time covering her annulled marriage to Melvin. 4 The district court correctly concluded that under sections 405(g) and (h), Mary may seek judicial review only after a final decision by the Secretary, i.e.,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “so that the agency may ... have an opportunity to correct its own errors, to afford the parties and the courts the benefit of its experience and expertise, and to compile a record that is adequate for judicial review.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.