Weinreb v. TR DEVELOPERS, LLC’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Siebert Oxidermo, Inc. v. Shields · Wise v. Curdes · 180 Ind. App. 496 - In Re the Marriage of Jones · Koval v. SIMON TELELECT. INC. · 176 Ind. App. 152 - Carvey v. Indiana National Bank
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[al party may not file repeated [rule 60(b) ] motions until he either offers a meritorious ground for relief or exhausts himself and the trial court in an effort to do so.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“establish that the grounds for that additional error were unknown and unknowable to the movant at the time he made the first Rule 60(b) motion”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“was available ... at the time he filed his first 60(b) motion and with due diligence could have been included in the original motion,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.