Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 943 P.2d 1347 - State v. Pearson

State v. Pearson’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
2
states following
September 2017
most recently cited

21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently September 2017

21 state decisions

110199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Terzado-Madruga · State v. Lafferty · State v. Hamilton · State v. Rimmasch · Lafferty v. Cook

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A prosecutor's comments constitute misconduct when they call the jurors' attention to matters not proper for their consideration and when the comments have a reasonable likelihood of prejudicing the jury by significantly influencing its verdict.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. State v. Tiliaia · State v. Reed
  2. “addressed matters that are within the general realm of human experience and common sense”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. State v. Davis · State v. Ashcraft
  3. “(a) It is established by proof of the same or less than all the facts required to establish the commission of the offense charged; or (b) It constitutes an attempt, solicitation, conspiracy, or form of preparation to commit the offense charged or an offense otherwise included therein; or (c) It is specifically designated by a statute as a lesser included offense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. State v. Kruger

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.