State v. JF’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
August 1998
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 98 Wash. 2d 789 - State v. Crenshaw · 102 Wash. 2d 19 - State v. QD · 110 Wash. 2d 886 - State v. SP · 75 Wash. App. 404 - State v. Linares · 49 Wash. App. 45 - State v. SP
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Children of eight and under twelve years of age are presumed to be incapable of committing crime, but this presumption may be removed by proof that they have sufficient capacity to understand the act or neglect, and to know that it was wrong.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. TEH · State v. JB“`The more intuitively obvious the wrongfulness of the conduct, the more likely it is that a child is aware that some form of societal consequences will attach to the act.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. TEH“[c]apacity is a jurisdictional issue and was not a matter with which J.F. was charged in the information.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. JB
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.