Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 943 P.2d 649 - State v. Schweitzer

State v. Schweitzer’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
2
states following
February 2018
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently February 2018

11 state decisions

50199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Monson v. Carver · State v. Webb · State v. Gerrard · State v. Anderson · State v. Brooks

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he exercise of discretion in sentencing necessarily reflects the personal judgment of the court and the appellate court can properly find abuse only if it can be said that no reasonable [person] would take the view adopted by the trial court. Additionally, [t]his discretion is not to be surrendered to a mathematical formula by which numbers of circumstances rather than weight of circumstances are determinative. The overriding consideration is that the sentence be just. One factor in mitigation or aggravation may weigh more than several factors on the opposite scale.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “does not authorize the trial court, upon imposing restitution, to also order the sale of [a] defendant's property to satisfy that restitution order. Rather, it contemplates that the trial court's role is limited to deciding, based on the statutorily imposed factors ... whether restitution is appropriate and in what amount.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “infringe[ ] upon the Board of Pardon's duties to monitor a defendant's progress and abrogate[ ] the [BJoard's flexibility to parole a defendant earlier.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.