943 So. 2d 746 - Jackson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
April 2014
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 671 So. 2d 647 - Peterson v. State · 716 So. 2d 1083 - Gleeton v. State · Ellis v. State · 902 So. 2d 615 - Forkner v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“All indictments may be amended as to form but not as to the substance of the offense charged. Indictments may also be amended to charge the defendant as [a] habitual offender or to elevate the level of the offense where the offense is one which is subject to enhanced punishment for subsequent offenses and the amendment is to assert prior offenses justifying such enhancement.... [An][a]mendment shall be allowed only if the defendant is afforded a fair opportunity to present a defense and is not unfairly surprised.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Curry v. State · Rice v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.