Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

943 So. 2d 917

Docket No. 1D06-3647.

Frazier v. State

Vanita FRAZIER, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 1, 2006.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2006-12-01

Relies on Munn v. Florida Parole Commission · 919 So. 2d 618 - Wiley v. State

Decided 2006-12-01

¶1Vanita Frazier, pro se, Petitioner.

¶2Charlie Crist, Attorney General; Felicia A. Wilcox and Betty Cheramie, Assistant Attorneys General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

¶3PER CURIAM.

¶4In light of the circuit court's order directing the State Attorney to file a response, we find that the granting of mandamus relief to compel a ruling on petitioner's pending motion for postconviction relief is not warranted. See Munn v. Fla. Parole Comm'n,807 So.2d 733 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002). Therefore, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus but we strongly encourage the circuit court to promptly rule on petitioner's motion for postconviction relief. See Wiley v. State,919 So.2d 618 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006).

¶5BARFIELD, WEBSTER, and POLSTON, JJ., concur.

/943/so2d/917 · .json · Public domain