Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

943 S.W.2d 252

Summers v. Hemann

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 25, 1997

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 1997-03-25

Decided 1997-03-25

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2Defendant appeals from a judgment on a jury verdict in favor of plaintiff on plaintiffs claims for malicious prosecution and intentional infliction of emotional harm. We affirm.

¶3Sufficient evidence supports the jury verdict and no error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential ' value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

¶4The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

/943/sw2d/252 · .json · Public domain