King v. Unidynamics Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
27 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently August 2014 · most notably Carter v. St. John's Regional Medical Center (2002), Hatch v. V.P. Fair Foundation, Inc. (1999)
27 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Detling v. Edelbrock · Ross v. Clouser · Koehler v. Burlington Northern, Inc. · Wells v. Orthwein · McGowan v. Hoffman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“so grossly excessive that it shocks the conscience and convinces this court that both the trial judge and the jury have abused their discretion.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“In considering whether or not an instruction is supported by evidence, the court views the evidence and all reasonable inferences therefrom in the light most favorable to the party offering the instruction.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“It is a well settled rule of law that any issue submitted to the jury in an instruction must be supported by evidence from which the jury could reasonably find such issue.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.