Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

943 S.W.2d 342

State v. Peebles

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 8, 1997

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 1997-04-08

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently June 1999

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1997-04-08

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2Movant appeals after sentencing of charges of assault first degree, § 565.050 RSMo 1994 and armed criminal action, § 571.015 RSMo 1994. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment. Judgment affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

/943/sw2d/342 · .json · Public domain