Cuellar v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
June 2007
most recently cited
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Almanza v. State · St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Camp · Tompkins v. Texas · Johnson v. First National Bank of Montevideo
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“when a potential juror answers a question on a jury card in a manner that would not arouse any reasonable suspicion that the juror might be biased or prejudiced, ... counsel is entitled to rely on the truthfulness and accuracy of the response. In such instance, ... counsel should not be required to inquire further into that response during voir dire in order to preserve error. To rule otherwise would undermine one of the primary purposes of the information cards.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Preiss v. Moritz
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.