Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 944 F.2d 1235 - Spa Esercizio v. Roberts

Spa Esercizio v. Roberts’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

92
cited by 92 later decisions
November 2024
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 9 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 92 later decisions — most recently November 2024 · most notably Brookfield Communications, Inc. v. West Coast Entertainment Corp. (1999), Midwest Industries, Inc. v. Karavan Trailers, Inc. (1999)

11 federal appellate · 9 district ·

4401990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. Hodory · Inwood Laboratories, Inc. v. Ives Laboratories, Inc. · Kuntz v. City of Dayton · Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Stiffel Co. · Stern v. Board of Levee Commissioners

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 92 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “That is the article I want because I know its source,”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[i]n general terms, a product feature is functional if it is essential to the use or purpose of the article, or if it affects the cost or quality of the article.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “'Where the copying by one party of another's product is not done to deceive purchasers and thus derive a benefit from another's name and reputation, but rather to avail oneself of a design which is attractive and desirable, a case of unfair competition is not made out.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.