Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 944 F.2d 1477 - Lutz v. Secretary of the Air Force

Lutz v. Secretary of the Air Force’s Empirical Analysis

944 F.2d 1477 · 1991

Citation profile

61
cited by 61 later decisions
2
states following
August 2022
most recently cited

35 federal appellate · 5 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 61 later decisions — most recently August 2022 · most notably Pelletier v. Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco (1992), Mier v. Owens (1995)

35 federal appellate · 5 district · 2 state decisions

3701991200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp. · Mitchell v. Forsyth · Abney v. United States · Feres v. United States · Robertson v. Methow Valley Citizens Council

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 61 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “This circuit has extended the application of Feres to suits between individual members of the military, recognizing an 'intramilitary immunity' from suits based on injuries sustained incident to service.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “arise out of or are in the course of activity incident to service.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “that not every action by one member of the armed services against another implicates military decision making, relates to the military mission, or is incident to service.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.