Bellini Imports, Ltd. v. Mason & Dixon Lines, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
944 F.2d 199 · 1991
Citation profile
1 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently July 2017 · most notably Vega v. Gasper (1994), Martino v. First National Bank of Harvey (In Re Garofalo's Finer Foods, Inc.) (1995)
1 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Cablevision Co. v. Motion Picture Ass'n of America, Inc. · Allen v. California · Grady v. Ah Robins Company Incorporated · Bridge v. Lynaugh · Ely v. Tracey Navigation Co
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Because attachment or execution of a judgment obtained as a result of a post-petition claim would fall within the stay provision of subsections 362(a)(3) and (4), a creditor must obtain relief from the stay to satisfy a judgment against property of the bankruptcy estate.”). 5 . In its supplemental brief, Larami argues, for the first time, that 28 U.S.C. § 959 (a) allows it to commence this patent infringement action notwithstanding the automatic stay provisions of 11 U.S.C. § 362 (a). Because the Court has held that the automatic stay of 11 U.S.C. § 362 (a) does not bar Larami from asserting its claims before this Court, we need not consider the applicability of the exception to the automatic stay contained in § 959(a). 6 . As an initial matter, the Court notes that the Bankruptcy Court is able to exercise jurisdiction over títis case as it is a matter "relating to”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Except as provided in subsection (b) of this section, a petition filed under section 301, 302, or 308 of this title, or an application filed under section 5(a)(3) of the Securities Investor Protection Act of 1970 (15 U.S.C. 78eee(a)(3)), operates as a stay, applicable to all entities, of (1)the commencement or continuation, including the issuance or employment of process, of a judicial, administrative, or other action or proceeding against the debtor that was or could have been commenced before the commencement of the ease under this title, or to recover a claim against the debtor that arose before the commencement of the case under this title. (Emphasis added).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.