Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 944 F.2d 334 - Sullivan v. Freeman

Sullivan v. Freeman’s Empirical Analysis

944 F.2d 334 · 1991

Citation profile

47
cited by 47 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
January 2013
most recently cited

27 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 47 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 2013 · most notably United States v. Comstock (2010), Singletary v. Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co. (1993)

27 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions

260199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Polk County v. Dodson · Ferri v. Ackerman · Arbour v. Jenkins · Moss v. Clark · Orville E. Stifel, II v. William F. Hopkins, Esq.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[S]ince domicile is a voluntary status, a forcible change in a person's state of residence does not alter his domicile; hence the domicile of [a] prisoner before he was imprisoned is presumed to remain his domicile while he is in prison.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “government [is not] meaningfully an employer responsible for the care with which the lawyer does his work.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[i]n relation to the federal government a federal defender is functionally an independent contractor,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.