Klarfeld v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
944 F.2d 583 · 1991
Citation profile
19 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently November 2024 · most notably Barron, Bull v. City of San Francisco (2010)
19 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San Francisco · See v. City of Seattle · Schweiker v. Wilson · Morgan v. United States · Schreiber Distributing Co. v. Serv-Well Furniture Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Dismissal is appropriate only if the plaintiff 'can prove no set of facts in support of [her] claim which would entitle [her] to relief.'”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Jones · Czajkowski“'unless the court determines that the allegation of other facts consistent with the challenged pleading could not possibly cure the deficiency.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“We review de novo a district court's dismissal of an action for failure to state a claim.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.