Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 944 F.2d 724 - Devery Implement Co. v. J.I. Case Co.

Devery Implement Co. v. J.I. Case Co.’s Empirical Analysis

944 F.2d 724 · 1991

Citation profile

82
cited by 82 later decisions
2
states following
January 2024
most recently cited

27 federal appellate · 38 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 82 later decisions — most recently January 2024 · most notably Thomson v. Salt Lake County (2009), Amoco Oil Co. v. Ervin (1996)

27 federal appellate · 38 district · 3 state decisions

6101991200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co. · Salve Regina College v. Russell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 82 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “anytime the facts and circumstances surrounding a relationship 'would allow a reasonably prudent person to repose confidence in another person.'”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “there is no genuine issue to any material fact and ... the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “set forth specific facts showing that there is a genuine issue for trial.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.