Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

944 F.2d 903

Docket No. 91-7060.

Williams v. Klein

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted June 27, 1991. Decided Sept. 23, 1991.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1991-09-23

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on United States v. Abdul Saiyed, United States of America v. Abdul Saiyed

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1991-09-23

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Herbert F. Murray, Senior District Judge. (CA-90-2273-HM)

Hubert James Williams, appellant pro se.

John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Md., for appellees.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before DONALD RUSSELL, SPROUSE and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Hubert James Williams appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Williams v. Klein, CA-90-2273-HM (D.Md. Mar. 6, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2

AFFIRMED.

/944/f2d/903 · .json · Public domain