944 F2d 912 Kelley v. Attorney General of United States

944 F.2d 912

James O. KELLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF the UNITED STATES, Department of Labor,
Wage & Hour Division, Judge Van Antwerp, 36 District Court,
Judge Byrd, Gerald R. Freeman, Office of Lawyer's
Professional Responsibility, William J. Wernz, Office of
Lawyer's Professional Responsibility, Postal Service,
Claim's & Inquiry, Judge Edward L. Pillippine, US District
Court-Eastern District MO, Michigan Bureau of Worker's
Disability Compensation, Harold G. Schenker, Ryder's
System's Inc., US Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of New
York, State of Michigan-Kent, US Court of Appeals, Fourth
Circuit, US District Court, Alexandria, VA, Fairfax County
General District Court, Hashmatollah Ghassemi Dehkordi,
Virginia Employment Commission, Department of Social
Services, Commonwealth of Virginia, Ms. S. Allan Alexander,
Steve Acard, International Total Services, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 91-1232.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

July 8, 1991.

NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.8(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.

Before NIES, Chief Judge, and PAULINE NEWMAN and PLAGER, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

NIES, Chief Judge.

Advertisement
view counter
1

Appellant's complaint, filed in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, was dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Appellant then filed a notice of appeal indicating that the appeal should be directed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. However, the case was sent to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Thereafter, the appeal was transferred by the Clerk of the Court to this court in accordance with the notice.

2

Upon consideration of appellant's complaint, we discern no basis for jurisdiction in this court. Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED.