England v. Horbach’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently May 2013
2 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Walker · Landes v. Capital City Bank · Sevy v. Security Title Co. of Southern Utah · Estate Landscape & Snow Removal Specialists, Inc. v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. · Girard v. Appleby
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the trial court ... may grant or deny a party's motion for amendment upon any reasonable basis”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[There could have been no accord and satisfaction ... because the first element of accord and satisfaction-the existence of a bona fide dispute or uncertainty over an un-liquidated amount-was not present.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“A mutual mistake occurs when both parties, at the time of contracting, share a misconception about a basic assumption or vital fact upon which they based their bargain.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.