Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 944 P2D 43 - Bruner v. Petersen

Bruner v. Petersen’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
June 2020
most recently cited

22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently June 2020

22 state decisions

1301997200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Regents of the University of Michigan v. Ewing · Board of Curators of the University of Missouri v. Horowitz · Handley v. State, Department of Revenue · Earth Resources Co. of Alaska v. State, Department of Revenue · Peter Pan Seafoods, Inc. v. Stepanoff

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “independently review the merits of [the] administrative determination.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “[The economic incentive of $10,000 in wages, coupled with the request for punitive damages for an additional $10,000, demonstrates a sufficient economic incentive to bring the suit regardless of the possible public interest elements of his claim....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “unless it is such a substantial departure from accepted academic norms as to demonstrate that the person or committee responsible 'did not actually exercise professional judgment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.