Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 944 P2D 590 - People v. Dooley

People v. Dooley’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
2
states following
December 2014
most recently cited

17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently December 2014

17 state decisions

90199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on People v. McCrary · People v. Wiedemer · People v. Abbott · People v. Quintana · People v. Collins

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “terminate her relationship with the defendant in this case does not amount to the sort of serious and highly provoking act which is sufficient to excite an irresistible passion in a reasonable person.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[Flacts bearing so remotely upon or which are so collateral to the issue that they afford only a conjectural inference should not be admitted in evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.