Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

944 So. 2d 1027

Docket No. 4D06-479.

State v. Smiley

STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Robert Lee SMILEY, Jr., Respondent.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2006-06-01

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently May 2018

3 state decisions

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

“DOES SECTION 776.013, FLORIDA STATUTES (2005), APPLY TO CASES PENDING AT THE TIME THE STATUTE BECAME EFFECTIVE?”

quoted by 2 later decisions, including Smiley v. State, 954 So. 2d 740 - Nulutagua-Sanchez v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2006-06-01

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Melanie Dale Surber, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for petitioner.

¶2Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for respondent.

¶3

*1028On Motion for Rehearing

¶4WARNER, J.

¶5We deny rehearing but grant respondent's motion to certify the issue as one of great public importance.

DOES SECTION 776.013, FLORIDA STATUTES (2005), APPLY TO CASES PENDING AT THE TIME THE STATUTE BECAME EFFECTIVE?

¶6FARMER and KLEIN, JJ., concur.

/944/so2d/1027 · .json · Public domain