Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

944 So. 2d 1036

Jennings v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2006-07-12

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently May 2012

4 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2006-07-12

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1The trial court revoked appellant’s probation finding that appellant committed a theft of a firearm, possession of a firearm, escaping the probation office, and disguising his identity. We conclude that the court erred in finding that appellant had disguised his identity, because there was no evidence other than hearsay that the appellant had given a false name while being arrested. We accordingly reverse the violation on that ground. Because we affirm the remaining violations, which were more serious, there is no need to remand for reconsideration by the trial court.

¶2Affirmed in part and reversed in part.

WARNER, KLEIN and GROSS, JJ., concur.
/944/so2d/1036 · .json · Public domain