Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 944 SO2D 1115 - Moore v. Perry

Moore v. Perry’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
March 2017
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 507 So. 2d 1080 - Smith v. Department of Ins. · 749 So. 2d 490 - Brown v. Estate of Stuckey · 817 So. 2d 841 - Armstead v. State · 403 So. 2d 391 - Adams v. Wright · 780 So. 2d 906 - In Re Certif. of Need for Add'l Judges

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “where the evidence is conflicting and the jury could have reached its verdict in a manner consistent with the evidence, it is error for the trial court to veto the jury verdict by granting a motion for additur.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.