Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

944 So. 2d 1225

Centano v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 20, 2006

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2006-12-20

Decided 2006-12-20

ROTHENBERG, Judge.

¶1Teofilo B. Centano (“defendant”) appeals the trial court’s order summarily denying his motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a), as repetitious. As the order provided by the defendant contains no attachments, we are unable to provide meaningful review. We, therefore, reverse and remand for the issuance of a new order with the record attachments that conclusively refute the defendant’s claims, if the motion is denied. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(b)(2)(D)(requiring reversal by this court unless the record shows conclusively that the defendant is entitled to no relief).

¶2Reversed and remanded.

/944/so2d/1225 · .json · Public domain