¶1David Gamble, pro se, Appellant.
¶2No appearance for Appellee.
¶3PER CURIAM.
¶4Upon consideration of the appellant's response to the Court's order of November *1230 8, 2006, the Court has determined that the Order Denying Defendant's Motion to Amend Defendant's Motion to Dismiss and Defendant's Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Motion for Rehearing is not an appealable order. Accordingly, the appeal is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
¶5BROWNING, C.J., DAVIS, and LEWIS, JJ., concur.