Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

944 So. 2d 1243

Docket No. 1D05-3996.

Pride v. State

Larry PRIDE, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 28, 2006.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2006-12-28

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently April 2009

1 state decisions

Relies on 927 So. 2d 216 - Wagner v. McDonough · Saunders v. State · Schimmel v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2006-12-28

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1*1244 Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and M. Gene Stephens, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

¶2Charlie Crist, Attorney General, and Carolyn J. Mosley, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

¶3PER CURIAM.

¶4Larry Pride, Jr. appeals his conviction for sale of cocaine. We summarily affirm Issues I and II raised by Pride. In his third issue, appellant argues that the trial court committed a sentencing error contrary to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.720(d)(1) by imposing a public-defender lien without affording him notice of the right to contest the amount. We agree and reverse. See Schimmel v. State,940 So.2d 584 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006); Wagner v. McDonough,927 So.2d 216 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006); and Saunders v. State,863 So.2d 458 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004). On remand, the trial court, in its discretion, may reimpose the lien after compliance with rule 3.720(d)(1).

¶5AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

¶6WEBSTER, BENTON, AND VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.

/944/so2d/1243 · .json · Public domain