Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

944 So. 2d 341

Docket No. SC05-2170.

Morrison v. Roos

Christopher MORRISON, Petitioner, v. Eleonora Bianca ROOS, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided November 30, 2006.

Supreme Court of Florida · decided 2006-11-30

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently September 2008

3 state decisions

Relies on Roos v. Morrison

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2006-11-30

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Elizabeth K. Russo and Jonathan L. Gaines of Russo Appellate Firm, P.A., Miami, FL, and J. Stephen O'Hara, Jr. of O'Hara Spradley, P.A., Jacksonville, FL, for Petitioner.

¶2Thomas E. Duffy, Jr. of Terrell, Hogan, Ellis and Yegelwel, P.A., Jacksonville, FL, for Respondent.

¶3PER CURIAM.

¶4We initially accepted jurisdiction to review the decision in Roos v. Morrison, 913 So.2d 59 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005), based on a question certified by the First District Court of Appeal to be of great public importance. See art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const.

¶5*342 Upon further consideration, we have determined that we should exercise our discretion and discharge jurisdiction of this cause. Accordingly, this review proceeding is hereby dismissed.

¶6It is so ordered.

¶7LEWIS, C.J., and WELLS, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, QUINCE, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur.

/944/so2d/341 · .json · Public domain