944 So. 2d 35 - Lee v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
August 2018
most recently cited
15 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 863 So. 2d 836 - Byrom v. State · 567 So. 2d 237 - Johnston v. State · 671 So. 2d 647 - Peterson v. State · Love v. State · 771 So. 2d 883 - Spann v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) the removal of the surplusage must not change the substance of the offense charged; (2) the defendant must be afforded a fair opportunity to present a defense and must not be unfairly surprised; (3) the removal of the surplusage must not materially alter the essential facts of the offense; and (4) the removal of the surplusage must not alter a defense under the original indictment. '”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“(1) A person is guilty of sexual battery if he or she engages in sexual penetration with: (a) Another person without his or her consent.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“one embodying a fact substantive in its nature and relevant to the issue made in the case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.