State v. Witthaus’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
March 2015
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Sanderson · 718 So. 2d 155 - LO v. State · 520 So. 2d 664 - McCaskill v. State · 618 So. 2d 1364 - Gladfelter v. State · 620 So. 2d 1304 - Skaggs v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The order appealed is an order that struck a previously entered restitution order setting the amount of restitution to be made as a condition of probation. It had the practical effect of denying restitution. Thus, the order was essentially an order denying restitution. Accordingly, we review this matter as an appeal from an order denying restitution. See State v. Hitchmon, 678 So.2d 460, 462 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996) (finding order striking condition of probation that requires restitution is properly viewed as order denying restitution ap-pealable by the state).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.