Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 944 S.W.2d 18 - Ex Parte Casey

Ex Parte Casey’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
June 2018
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently June 2018

6 state decisions

30199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 246th Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Mingus, Receiver v. Wadley · Ex Parte Barnett · Ex Parte Gordon · Ex Parte Shaffer · Ex Parte Friedman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a) Except as provided by Subsection (b) of this section, Sections 10.01 and 10.02 of this article take effect September 1, 1995, and apply only to an action filed on or after that date. (b) Section 10.02 of this article does not apply to an action filed on or before January 1,1997, if a prior suit for dissolution of a marriage between the parties was non-suited by the spouse seeking maintenance on or after January 1, 1995, and on.or before August 31,1995. (c) An-action to which Section 10.02 of this Article does not apply is governed by the law in effect at the time the action was filed, and that law is continued in effect only for that purpose. (Emphasis added). Act of June 13, 1995, 74th Leg,, R.S., ch. 655, § 10.03 1995 Tex. Gen. Laws 3543 , 3580.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.