Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 944 SW2D 311 - State v. Hendrix

State v. Hendrix’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
December 1998
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Reorganized School District No. 7 v. Douthit · State v. Hampton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “... [A]s a result of illegal drug sales, in which I had engaged, prior to June 26, 1992,1 made a profit therefrom, in the sum of ... $40,108.00 ...; I was able to deposit the sum of ... $20,000.00 ... in a savings account, at the Commerce Bank, of St. Joseph, Missouri; the remaining profit, in the sum of ... $20,108.00 ..., I invested in silver and silver coins, as an investment. ... [A]s part [of] a plea agreement, with the State of Missouri, in Case No. CR592-369FX, I will voluntarily surrender to the Prosecuting Attorney, of Buchanan County, Missouri, a bank draft, made payable to the County Treasurer, of Buchanan County, Missouri, in the sum ... $40,108.00 ..., which represents the total profits I earned form the illegal sale of controlled substances, within Buchanan County, Missouri, as above set out. ... I have been advised by my attorney, that I would have a right to a hearing, under the Criminal Activities Forfeiture Act of the State of Missouri, to determi-nine [sic] whether the above-listed cash assets were subject to forfeiture[;] however, I admit that the sum of cash money ... was derived from the illegal sale of controlled substances, and I do hereby waive my right to said hearing, and consent to the forfeiture of said cash money.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.